IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v5y2001i1119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

As melhores empresas para trabalhar no Brasil e a qualidade de vida no trabalho: disjunções entre a teoria e a prática

Author

Listed:
  • Suzana da Rosa Tolfo
  • Valmíria Carolina Piccinini

Abstract

The present article discusses the results of surveys about the best companies to work for in Brazil, conducted by Exame magazine in the years 1997, 1999 and 2000. The researchers identified the 30, 50 and 100 companies which offered in the respective years the most attractive working conditions, based on dimensions which allow an evaluation of the best practices in the human resources area. The items investigated present a close resemblance to Walton's (1973) model of quality of working life. The methodology used was characterized as descriptive-exploratory. The data analysis indicates that those organizations whose practices were evaluated positively by their employees in the years 1997 and 1999 propitiated, first of all, a sense of pride in the work and in the company. In the year 2000 the most valued aspects were career opportunities and training. In general terms, we have observed that there has been a reduction in the number of companies which received top grades from their employees, as well as in the number of items positively evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzana da Rosa Tolfo & Valmíria Carolina Piccinini, 2001. "As melhores empresas para trabalhar no Brasil e a qualidade de vida no trabalho: disjunções entre a teoria e a prática," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 5(1), pages 165-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:5:y:2001:i:1:119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/119/120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/119/120
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:5:y:2001:i:1:119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.