IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v4y2000i3101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treinamento: análise do relacionamento da avaliação nos níveis de reação, aprendizagem e impacto no trabalho

Author

Listed:
  • Gardênia Abbad
  • Ana Lidia Gomes Gama
  • Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade

Abstract

The present paper aims to report the validation of training reaction scales, as well as to report the results from an analysis of the relationship among the three most common levels: reaction, learning and impact of training on work. The scientific literature has shown that the relationship between these levels has not always been significant, or toward the predicted direction. Despite their relevance, valid and reliable reaction measures are very rare. The used reaction questionnaire contains 39 items. It was applied in a sample of 229 training events. Approximately 3,700 valid questionnaires were subjected to factorial analysis (PAF - direct oblimin) and internal consistency analysis (Cronbach's alpha). Two scales with high level of reliabily were obtained: one of them concerning training reactions and the another concerning the instructor performance. Finally, very strong relationships were found between the reaction and impact levels, but poor relationships between the reactionand the learning level. The results are discussed in terms of their practical and theoretical implications for training evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gardênia Abbad & Ana Lidia Gomes Gama & Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade, 2000. "Treinamento: análise do relacionamento da avaliação nos níveis de reação, aprendizagem e impacto no trabalho," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 4(3), pages 25-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:4:y:2000:i:3:101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/101/102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/101/102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:4:y:2000:i:3:101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.