IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v4y2000i294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflexões sobre a regulamentação

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Fernando Cruz Basso
  • Marcelo Roque da Silva

Abstract

The goal of this work was to present the three theories that defend the monopoly and oligopoly deregulation: Demsetz critic, theory of contestable markets and theory of capture. This was achieved using bibliographic and Internet research. We support the debate concerning this economical aspect, in Brazil and other countries, alerting about problems, costs and difficulties related to the regulation and also studying some industrial cases where the deregulation has already taken place. We concluded that much reflection is necessary when dealing with industrial regulation since there are less damaging options from the point of view of competition - and therefore more pro-consumers. The regulation, defended as a protection against abusive (monopolist) prices, among other problems may become a way of monopoly perpetuation; it could set prices and taxes in high levels, by collusion between regulated and regulators; it is expensive, difficult to execute and to monitor. The deregulation, despite its importance, is relatively not much debated, even though it could be a politic to be implemented in several situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Fernando Cruz Basso & Marcelo Roque da Silva, 2000. "Reflexões sobre a regulamentação," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 4(2), pages 67-85.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:4:y:2000:i:2:94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/94/95
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/94/95
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:4:y:2000:i:2:94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.