IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v4y2000i187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validação de uma medida de percepção de imagens organizacionais

Author

Listed:
  • Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade
  • Ronaldo Pilati

Abstract

The organizational images contruct has been considered useful for the understanding of human behavior at work. However, those images are almost always obtained from experts' or managers' opinions. A reliable measure of the perception of images, from the point of view of a broader set of organization members, is needed. The present work has tried to develop that measure, to test it within different organizational contexts in several parts of Brazil and to psychometrically validate it. Morgan's (1996) eight metaphors have served as the theoretical basis for formulating questions. The questionnaire was responded by almost 2.000 individuals, during two years, and it has been successively revised. Through the use of factor analysis, with oblique rotation, two perceived organizational images have been finally identified. The calculation of Cronbach's alpha scores has pointed out to adequate reliability indices for the safe use of the developed instrument in organizational research and analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade & Ronaldo Pilati, 2000. "Validação de uma medida de percepção de imagens organizacionais," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 4(1), pages 113-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:4:y:2000:i:1:87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/87/88
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/87/88
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:4:y:2000:i:1:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.