IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v3y1999i266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Percepção de suporte organizacional: desenvolvimento e validação de um questionário

Author

Listed:
  • Gardênia Abbad de Oliveira-Castro
  • Ronaldo Pilati
  • Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade

Abstract

The organizational behavior specialized literature has been considering the importance of the organizational support concept for the understanding of performance at work and of commitment, citizenship and turnover. However the research in the area needs reliable measures of the perception of support. This work reports the experience in developing a Brazilian questionnaire for support, based on Eisenberger et al. (1986) theoretical proposal and on private and public organizations workers surveyed aspects. These aspects were qualitatively analyzed and semantically validated and the resulting items were transformed in a questionnaire, that have been responded by a sample of 1384 workers. Their responses were submitted to a factorial analysis (PAF), with oblique rotation, and produced two types of empirical structures: one unifactorial - perception of organizational support and another with four sub-scales - performance management, work load, material support to performance and ascension, promotion and salaries. They all have high reliability scores (Cronbach's alphas). The use of this questionnaire in organizational behavior research is here discussed and more studies are suggested; they may insure a broader generalized utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Gardênia Abbad de Oliveira-Castro & Ronaldo Pilati & Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade, 1999. "Percepção de suporte organizacional: desenvolvimento e validação de um questionário," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 3(2), pages 29-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:3:y:1999:i:2:66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/66/66
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/66/66
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:3:y:1999:i:2:66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.