Author
Listed:
- Vânia Maria Jorge Nassif
- Jefferson Lopes La Falce
- Marcos Hashimoto
- Candido Vieira Borges Junior
- Edmilson de Oliveira Lima
Abstract
Objective: this study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to identify the threats experienced by women entrepreneurs in Brazil. Proposal: the research proposes the construction of a reliable and valid scale that captures three core dimensions of threats: patriarchal threats, role conflict, and affective dimensions. The central thesis is that women entrepreneurs face systemic and psychosocial threats that can be reliably measured, analyzed, and addressed through structured scientific investigation. Theoretical approach: the study draws on stereotype threat theory, the typology of entrepreneurial threats, and the literature on gender and entrepreneurship. It combines theories of gender role conflict, patriarchal norms, and emotional labor to frame the experience of women entrepreneurs. Methods: the research used a mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative phase, a Delphi panel involving 25 experts (entrepreneurs and academics) validated construct semantics and clarity. In the quantitative phase, 302 responses from Brazilian women entrepreneurs were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability tests. The instrument was structured using a five-point Likert scale. Results: the final instrument comprises 10 validated items across three dimensions. The EFA confirmed construct validity, with all items loading significantly on the expected factors. Cronbach’s alpha values exceeded 0.75 for all dimensions, indicating high internal consistency. Conclusions: the validated scale is a reliable tool to investigate threats faced by women entrepreneurs. It supports further research and interventions aimed at reducing gendered barriers in entrepreneurship.
Suggested Citation
Vânia Maria Jorge Nassif & Jefferson Lopes La Falce & Marcos Hashimoto & Candido Vieira Borges Junior & Edmilson de Oliveira Lima, 2026.
"Threats to Female Entrepreneurship: Construction and Validation of an Assessment Scale,"
RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 30(Vol. 30 N), pages 250224-2502.
Handle:
RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:2:1739
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:2:1739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.