IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v30y2026i21738.html

Accountability and Civil Society Organizations: An Integrity Maturity Self-Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Laís Dorigon Rodrigues
  • Elaine Cristina de Oliveira Menezes
  • Paula Chies Schommer

Abstract

Objective: this study analyzed integrity within civil society organizations (CSOs) and sought to propose and apply an integrity maturity self-assessment tool tailored to the nature and context of CSOs. Grounded in the concept of accountability, this study details integrity and its operationalization across different perspectives and programs. Methods: through a qualitative approach, data were collected via interviews, observations, documents, and articles. The study followed four stages: selecting integrity programs for CSOs; expert validation of the theoretical-methodological matrix; developing the self-assessment tool; and its subsequent application and analysis within an organization. Results: findings indicate that integrity is demonstrated when organizational practices align with principles, values, and objectives while fulfilling legal obligations and maintaining ethical stakeholder relations. The application of the matrix allowed for refinements and a critical analysis of the tool. Conclusion: the tool encompasses the accountability triad: objective responsibility, subjective responsibility, and responsiveness. Its potential lies in its self-assessment nature, anchored in subjective responsibility, which serves as a basis for problem prevention and resolution, ultimately fostering objective responsibility and responsiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Laís Dorigon Rodrigues & Elaine Cristina de Oliveira Menezes & Paula Chies Schommer, 2026. "Accountability and Civil Society Organizations: An Integrity Maturity Self-Assessment," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 30(Vol. 30 N), pages 250244-2502.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:2:1738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1738
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1738/2238
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:2:1738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.