IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v29y2025i31697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Bibliometrics: The Value of Literature Reviews in Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Chimenti

Abstract

I recall a story told by my dear friend, Professor Rebecca Arkader, who earned her Ph.D. in the 1990s at COPPEAD/UFRJ. To conduct the literature review for her dissertation, she had to travel to England for a sandwich Ph.D. program and isolate herself for weeks in a university library, where the most relevant articles in her field were physically available. Until just a few years ago, accessing scientific knowledge required significant time, travel, and logistical effort. Today, with just a few clicks, researchers can digitally access much of the world’s scientific output. This radical shift has introduced new challenges. As Jesson et al. (2011), point out, the problem is no longer how to access information, but how to filter, interpret, and organize it meaningfully. In this context, well-conducted literature reviews serve as true cognitive ‘hubs’ — much like Google organizes web content or Amazon connects products to user interests — enabling researchers to identify patterns, gaps, and future directions amidst the overwhelming volume of publications. Their value, therefore, lies not only in describing what is known, but in illuminating what we still need to understand.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Chimenti, 2025. "Beyond Bibliometrics: The Value of Literature Reviews in Management Research," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 29(Vol. 29 N), pages 250209-2502.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:29:y:2025:i:3:1697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1697
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1697/2138
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:29:y:2025:i:3:1697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.