IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v24y2020i31389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Organisational Ties in the Perception of the Management: Commitment, Entrenchment and Consent

Author

Listed:
  • Gean Carlos Tomazzoni
  • Vânia Costa
  • Claudia Simone Antonello
  • Maria Beatriz Rodrigues

Abstract

Objective: this study aimed to analyse the perception of the ties of commitment, entrenchment and consent of the worker with the organisation, exploring their distinctive factors and their meaning for the management. Method: a qualitative research was carried out with the management of companies of the retailing sector located in shopping malls. The data was gathered through ten semi-structured interviews and analysed using the content analysis technique. Results: this empirical work indicates that the managers’ perceptions not only confirm the conceptual limitation of the commitment models to their affective basis, they also reveal the prominence of other organisational ties like entrenchment and consent. The data reinforce that these ties show different notions, which also operate in different attitudes of the individual at work. Conclusion: these findings allow to understand the possible contextual influences on managing the different organizational ties, as well as their outcomes and impact on the performance of the individual at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Gean Carlos Tomazzoni & Vânia Costa & Claudia Simone Antonello & Maria Beatriz Rodrigues, 2020. "The Organisational Ties in the Perception of the Management: Commitment, Entrenchment and Consent," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 24(3), pages 245-258.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:24:y:2020:i:3:1389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1389/1457
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1389/1457
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noraazian & Khalip, 2016. "A three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(12), pages 16-23, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarwani Sarwani, 2024. "Empirical Models Determinant Employee Commitment and Retention Determinants in Shopping Centers: A Case of Indonesia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 32-47, September.
    2. Andrieli Fátima Paz Nunes & Deoclécio Junior Cardoso Silva & Beatriz Leite Gustmann Castro & Vânia Medianeira Flores Costa & Luis Felipe Dias Lopes & Gean Carlos Tomazzoni & Claudimar Pereira Veiga, 2023. "Evaluation based on organizational attachments and work performance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tri Widarmanti & Arif Partono Prasetio & Bachruddin Saleh Luturlean, 2021. "The Role of Employees Job Satisfaction in the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Affective Commitment at Roof-Tile Manufacturing Company," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 306319-3063, December.
    2. Leonardo Pompa, 2021. "Growing Thanks to Whom? The Impact of Staff on Demand on Organizational Growth Dynamics: Evidence from Sweden," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-80, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:24:y:2020:i:3:1389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.