IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v21y2017i41227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Influence in the Decision-Making Process: The Ultimatum Game

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Cristiane Santos Póvoa
  • Maickel Robert Maffezzolli
  • Wesley Pech
  • Wesley Vieira da Silva

Abstract

This paper analyzes gender differences regarding the decision-making process through a methodological approach, which is still insufficiently used in Brazil. However, it is recognized by the international academy: the economic experiment, specifically the Ultimatum Game, included within the scope of Game Theory. The experiment involved 320 participants divided into 5 subgroups moderated by gender. The results showed that in the process of interaction between individuals, the utility function must be understood not only as based on the premise of maximizing economic results, but it should take into account individual social preferences. Thus, one of the main findings was the identification of a major male predisposition for rejection of proposals coming from women, despite being comparatively more generous. Furthermore, women were observed to be more generous in their offerings compared with men. These finding are pioneering in Brazil and can be considered as an indicator of the influence gender has in the decision-making process, with important implications for the organizational environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Cristiane Santos Póvoa & Maickel Robert Maffezzolli & Wesley Pech & Wesley Vieira da Silva, 2017. "Gender Influence in the Decision-Making Process: The Ultimatum Game," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 21(4), pages 481-499.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:21:y:2017:i:4:1227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1227/1223
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1227/1223
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:21:y:2017:i:4:1227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.