IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v20y2016i21170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Perception of Fairness in Management Control Systems Increase Manager Commitment and Confidence?

Author

Listed:
  • Ilse Maria Beuren
  • Luciana Klein
  • Flávio Luiz Lara
  • Lauro Brito de Almeida

Abstract

The goal of this is study is to determine whether the perception of fairness regarding the dimensions of the Management Control Systems increases managers’ commitment and confidence. Thus, a descriptive research was carried out through a survey of 500 companies listed among the Best and Biggest by Exame Magazine, from which 180 agreed to participate in the study. The final sample consisted of 67 respondents. The instrument used consists of 26 statements, with seven-point Likert interval scales of measurement. The assumptions made in the study were tested with the application of a statistical multivariate analysis technique called Structural Equation Modeling. The survey results show that the controllability principle and the use of multiple performance indicators increase the perception of distributive and procedural fairness; the perception of interactional and procedural fairness dimensions increase managers’ commitment; and managers’ confidence is influenced by perceptions of distributive and interactional fairness. Based on these results we conclude that managers’ commitment and confidence can be prominent attitudinal and behavioral factors in reducing retaliatory actions caused by a sense of organizational unfairness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilse Maria Beuren & Luciana Klein & Flávio Luiz Lara & Lauro Brito de Almeida, 2016. "Does the Perception of Fairness in Management Control Systems Increase Manager Commitment and Confidence?," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 20(2), pages 216-237.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:20:y:2016:i:2:1170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1170/1166
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1170/1166
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:20:y:2016:i:2:1170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.