IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v19y2015ispe31151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contestations on Masculinity in the Context of Work: A Post-modernist Study of Mining and Steelworks

Author

Listed:
  • Eloísio Moulin de Souza
  • Mônica de Fatima Bianco
  • Gelson Silva Junquilho

Abstract

The sociohistorical time called postmodernity has destroyed previously established social boundaries (Bauman, 2001). A crisis of masculinity also prevails in this context, provoking a questioning of masculinity, as well as of the predominance of older male cultural models in organizational arenas (Amaral, 2005; Brooks, 2010; Robinson, 2000). Using a cultural approach (Connell, 2004; Prasad, 2012) this article aims to analyze how the changes in masculinity have affected the male division of labor in the mining and steel sector. An important aspect is that most of the work on gender is dedicated to studying femininity as something inherent to women, while another is studying the phenomenon of masculinity in the workplace. This field research was a qualitative one that collected data through semi-structured interviews. Changes were observed to have occurred in relation to the division of labor between men and women, however, these changes occur more rapidly in private life than in the workplace. Masculinity has the function of organizing work. An inability to perform work activities related to command and conceptualization is attributed to women and effeminate homosexual and heterosexual men.

Suggested Citation

  • Eloísio Moulin de Souza & Mônica de Fatima Bianco & Gelson Silva Junquilho, 2015. "Contestations on Masculinity in the Context of Work: A Post-modernist Study of Mining and Steelworks," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 19(spe3), pages 269-287.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:spe3:1151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1151/1147
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1151/1147
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:spe3:1151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.