IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v19y2015i51120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equally Weighed Portfolios with Few Stocks and Small Investors

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Carneiro Santiago
  • Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal

Abstract

This article analyzes equally-weighted stock portfolios (1/N) focusing on unsophisticated investors with small portfolios. The number of shares included in the 1/N portfolios ranged from 6 to 16 with rebalancing executed only three times a year. The period of analysis included daily and monthly returns between 1998 and 2011. The performance of the 1/N portfolios was compared to stock mutual funds, a global minimum variance portfolio with a 10% limit on positive weights (MVP 10%) and the Ibovespa index. The comparisons employed nonparametric tests, measures of risk-adjusted return and considered transaction costs. The results indicate that the performance of the selected funds is, at best, equivalent to the 1/N portfolios, albeit with a lower standard deviation. There was no significant difference in the median returns of the 1/N portfolios relative to the Ibovespa and MVP 10%. The stock selection criterion according to the ranking by the previous period Sharpe ratio is relevant, but rebalancing may be carried out less than three times a year. The 1/N portfolios are an attractive alternative to stock funds for investors with small stock portfolios even though their transaction costs may exceed 400 basis points per year.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Carneiro Santiago & Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal, 2015. "Equally Weighed Portfolios with Few Stocks and Small Investors," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 19(5), pages 544-564.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:5:1120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1120/1116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1120/1116
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:5:1120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.