IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v19y2015i31109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doing Business: A Comparative Analysis of the Rules in the BRICS

Author

Listed:
  • Diego de Queiroz Machado
  • Gleison Mendonça Diniz
  • Mario Henrique Ogasavara
  • Fátima Regina Ney Matos

Abstract

This study aims to characterize the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) based on an analysis of their regulations that affect the conducting of business. To do so, its theoretical foundation consisted of discussions on institutional theory and conducting business in the BRICS countries. Regarding methodology, data came from the Doing Business project, analyzed using a cluster analysis technique. The countries were separated into four groups: group 1, South Africa; group 2, China, India and Russia; group 3, Brazil; and group 4, formed mostly by developed countries, without the presence of any country in the BRICS. Group 4 was found to be the group with the best countries regarding the ease of doing business.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego de Queiroz Machado & Gleison Mendonça Diniz & Mario Henrique Ogasavara & Fátima Regina Ney Matos, 2015. "Doing Business: A Comparative Analysis of the Rules in the BRICS," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 19(3), pages 355-373.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:3:1109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1109/1105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1109/1105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:3:1109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.