IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v17y2013i51004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deconstruction of founder myths and succession in family businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Carlos Soares Pereira
  • Adriane Vieira
  • Fernando Coutinho Garcia
  • Maria Teresa de Azeredo Roscoe

Abstract

Functional myths promote business and interpersonal relationship structure, however, they become dysfunctional when they hinder the succession process. This research's objective was to identify the factors that contribute to the deconstruction of a myth in a family business that goes through the process of succession from the founder, and analyze how the myth relates to the development of systemic organization. The research method used was the case study. Data analysis revealed that the factors that contributed to the deconstruction of the myth were: a refusal to address issues related to family conflicts; centralization and authoritarian behavior about the myth; and not transmitting a sense of entrepreneurship to the successive generation. In the property dimension, the Group is in the initial stage and controlled by the owner, but the desire to replace the founding-myth has led to a transition to a state of society among siblings; in the family dimension, the Group is in the process of passing the baton, despite resistance from the founding-myth; and, finally, the corporate dimension is a state of expansion/formalization, despite the existence of underlying conflicts between family members.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Carlos Soares Pereira & Adriane Vieira & Fernando Coutinho Garcia & Maria Teresa de Azeredo Roscoe, 2013. "Deconstruction of founder myths and succession in family businesses," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 17(5), pages 518-535.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:17:y:2013:i:5:1004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1004/1000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1004/1000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:17:y:2013:i:5:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.