IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v15y2011i5883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience and organizational socialization among brazilian and norwegian civil servants

Author

Listed:
  • Virgínia Donizete de Carvalho
  • Livia de Oliveira Borges
  • Arne Vikan
  • Odin Hjemdal

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between resilience and organizational socialization among civil servants at two public universities in two different cultures, namely Brazil and Norway. Organizational socialization research has shown that an individual's adjustment to a new job and organization tends to be a stressful event and resilience, defined as the ability to overcome stress or adversity, could be of importance when it comes to explaining the differences in socialization outcomes among individuals at the same organization. Based on this assumption, research was conducted with a sample of Brazilian and Norwegian professors and technical-administrative employees. Hierarchical regression analyses were carried out to observe and compare the predictive power of resilience in relation to organizational socialization. The results showed that overall resilience added a significant incremental prediction to organizational socialization, beyond nationality and occupation. The predictive power of resilience in relation to organizational socialization was higher among the Brazilians than the Norwegians. The practical implications, limitations and main contributions of the study are discussed, with suggestions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Virgínia Donizete de Carvalho & Livia de Oliveira Borges & Arne Vikan & Odin Hjemdal, 2011. "Resilience and organizational socialization among brazilian and norwegian civil servants," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 15(5), pages 815-833.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:15:y:2011:i:5:883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/883/880
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/883/880
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:15:y:2011:i:5:883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.