IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v13y2009i1663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarity and dissimilarity between superiors and subordinates and their implications for dyadic relationship quality

Author

Listed:
  • Nereida Salette Paulo da Silveira
  • Darcy Mitiko Mori Hanashiro

Abstract

Although literature advocates the advantages of work force diversification, studies based on the Similarity- Attraction Paradigm indicate that people are more disposed to feel attraction to those who are similar to them. A field study with the comparative data of 89 dyads investigated the effect of the actual and perceived similarity in the quality of the relationship between superiors and subordinates within the Leader-Member Exchange [LMX] perspective. The investigated characteristics were: gender, age and work-family conflict. The data indicate the influence only of perceived similarity in the quality of the relationship between superiors and subordinates. This effect broadens when the subordinate feels satisfied with the quality and frequency of contact with his/her superior. The methodological procedures included factorial analysis and validation of two scales (EIFT and LMX-7), the correlations analysis and hierarchic regressions. Finally, the implications of some results and directions for future research in diversity are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nereida Salette Paulo da Silveira & Darcy Mitiko Mori Hanashiro, 2009. "Similarity and dissimilarity between superiors and subordinates and their implications for dyadic relationship quality," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 13(1), pages 117-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:13:y:2009:i:1:663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/663/660
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/663/660
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:13:y:2009:i:1:663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.