IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v11y2007ispe1573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Três contribuições conceituais neofuncionalistas à teoria institucional em organizações

Author

Listed:
  • João Marcelo Crubellate

Abstract

The most recent efforts in institutional theory applied to organization studies search for ways to overcome consequences of traditional dichotomies based on levels of analysis, social structures versus agency as source of practices, and so on. If in other social sciences that debate has received fundamental contributions in the last three or four decades, that is not the case for Organization Theory, where discussions are much more recent and based specially on Sociology authors. The main purpose of this theoretical essay is to describe some neofunctionalist concepts – system openness and closeness, double contingency and expectation of expectations – proposed by Niklas Luhmann, discussing their impact on those dichotomies, in the realm of Luhmannian theory of institutions. This effort is expected to contribute with alternatives to that theoretical discussion that mark institutional organization theory at least in the last two decades.

Suggested Citation

  • João Marcelo Crubellate, 2007. "Três contribuições conceituais neofuncionalistas à teoria institucional em organizações," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 11(spe1), pages 199-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:11:y:2007:i:spe1:573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/573/570
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/573/570
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:11:y:2007:i:spe1:573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.