Author
Listed:
- Dorina CLICHICI
(Senior Researcher, PhD, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy)
- Cristina-Georgiana ZELDEA
(Researcher, PhD Student, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, Bucharest University of Economic Studies)
Abstract
The Covid-19 crisis has severely affected Central and Eastern European (CEE) states, causing major economic activities to be blocked during the pandemic, shrinking domestic demand and investment. The aim of the research is to analyse the impact of the pandemic event on CEE banking systems, in the light of the most relevant indicators of banking stability. Both qualitative and quantitative research methods were used to achieve the goal. The results of the analysis revealed that the pandemic crisis did not affect the quality of banking assets in the CEE, the rate of non-performing loans remained at a fairly low level in the most of the states. At the same time, due to major reforms that followed the international financial crisis of 2008, banks have a sufficiently high level of capitalization and a reasonable level of indebtedness, reflecting a high resilience to shock of CEE banking systems. However, extremely low level of interest rates in the pandemic have determined a deterioration in asset performance in most banking systems in the CEE. Moreover, the outlook regarding the CEE banking systems remains quite uncertain. Considering the large-scale measures to reschedule credit rates, through moratoriums on bank loans, but also the financial support schemes initiated by central banks and governments, the CEE region is facing high risk costs, which manifest mainly through the migration over time of credit risk exposure. In this context, non-performing loan ratios are expected to increase in the near future. Moreover, the widespread shift to lower interest rates will exert pressure on lending margins.
Suggested Citation
Dorina CLICHICI & Cristina-Georgiana ZELDEA, 2021.
"The Resilience Of Central And Eastern European Banking Systems During The Covid-19 Crisis,"
Economy and Sociology, The Journal Economy and Sociology, issue 2, pages 20-29.
Handle:
RePEc:aat:journl:y:2021:i:2:p:20-29
DOI: 10.36004/nier.es.2021.2-02
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aat:journl:y:2021:i:2:p:20-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iordachi Victoria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iefscmd.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.