IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aag/wpaper/v26y2022ispecialp53-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Green Innovation Ability of Engineering Teams in a Hesitation Fuzzy Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhan Nie

    (International College, Krirk University, Thailand)

  • Jiafu Su

    (International College, Krirk University, Thailand)

Abstract

[Purpose] In this paper, the hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method is used to present a green innovation ability (GIA) assessment technique for engineering teams. [Design/methodology/approach] In the evaluation method, we propose four evaluation indicators for GI input, GI implementation ability, GI development ability, and GI resource integration ability based on the evaluation indicators of GIA proposed by previous scholars, and use hesitant fuzzy sets as the expression tool for evaluation information. Thereafter, by improving the method proposed by Su et al. (2023) for positive and negative ideal points, this paper proposes a new evaluation method. [Findings] Through the use of this method, we found that it can fully consider the fuzziness and hesitancy of evaluators in uncertain environments, and express them in the form of fuzzy numbers. This shows that the method is viable, reasonable, and applicable to genuine evaluation procedures. Furthermore, this study provides a theoretical reference for the evaluation of engineering teams and other fields. [Originality/Value] In this research, a decision-making reference point for the ideal point is proposed using the three-point estimate method, an integrated time estimation approach in the program evaluation and review technique (PERT). The research applies the hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method to evaluate the green innovation capability of engineering teams by improving it. Further, the decision-making method is extended and applied to make some contributions to decision science.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhan Nie & Jiafu Su, 2022. "Evaluating the Green Innovation Ability of Engineering Teams in a Hesitation Fuzzy Environment," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 26(Special), pages 53-76, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:26:y:2022:i:special:p:53-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iads.site/evaluating-the-green-innovation-ability-of-engineering-teams-in-a-hesitation-fuzzy-environment/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    hesitant fuzzy set; multi-attribute decision-making; engineering team; green innovation ability; evaluation method.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:26:y:2022:i:special:p:53-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Pan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfasitw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.