IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aae/journl/v9y2013i2p61-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context and Animacy Play a Role in Dynamic Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Magda Osman

    (Queen Mary University of London, Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences)

  • Alexandros Ananiadis-Basias

    (Queen Mary University of London)

Abstract

Perception, judgment, and reasoning are all processes that are sensitive to cues to animacy (i.e. the presence of signals that indicate an object behaves as if it has intentions and internal goals). The present study investigated the following question: Does animacy facilitate decision-making in a dynamic control system? To address this, the present study used a dynamic decision-making task and compared behavior in four different contexts (Abstract, Animate-Social, Inanimate-Social, Inanimate- Non-social). Participants were randomly allocated to one of these contexts, and in each version they were required to learn to manipulate variables in order to bring the dynamic system to a desirable state and maintain it at that level. The findings suggest that it is not animacy per se that facilitates decision-making behavior, but rather the presence of a context. However, animacy made an impact on the type of strategic behavior implemented when interacting with the dynamic system. We argue that context induces general beliefs about causal relationships in dynamic environments that generalize across animate as well as inanimate contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Magda Osman & Alexandros Ananiadis-Basias, 2013. "Context and Animacy Play a Role in Dynamic Decision-Making," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 9(2), pages 61-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:61-78
    DOI: 10.7341/2013924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol9/issue2/JEMI_Vol_9_Issue_2_2013_Article_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7341/2013924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:61-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Ujwary-Gil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://fundacjacognitione.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.