IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aae/journl/v22y2026i2p5-51.html

Managers’ social relationships and organizational innovativeness: Insights from creative industries

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Czernek-MarszaÅ‚ek

    (University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287, Poland)

  • Patrycja Klimas

    (Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120; 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Dagmara Wójcik

    (University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287, Poland)

  • Patrycja Juszczyk

    (University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Szpulak

    (Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120; 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate whether and how managers’ social relationships (SR) are associated with organizational innovativeness (OI). It addresses gaps in prior research by adopting a multidimensional perspective on both constructs and focusing on creative industries, where relationships and innovation are particularly intertwined. METHODOLOGY: A mixed-methods research approach with a convergent design was employed, combining parallel quantitative and qualitative investigations. Quantitative data were collected via a survey of 690 managers from creative industries in Poland, with a final cleaned sample of 302 observations. The developed research model was tested using a covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) approach. Qualitative insights were obtained from five focus group interviews (FGIs) involving 30 participants, which were analyzed using a deductive-inductive coding approach to enrich and triangulate the findings. FINDINGS: The quantitative results indicate that SR – comprising five valid building blocks (emotional intensity, community of interest, shared identity, private contacts, and professional community interactions) – are significantly associated with OI, although the strength and direction of these associations vary across building blocks and OI’s dimensions. Simultaneously, qualitative research emphasizes the strong ambivalent nature of SR, which typically stimulate innovation through trust and knowledge exchange, but may also constrain it under conditions of excessive emotional intensity, overly strong shared identity leading to closure, private contacts that become nepotistic or conflict-ridden, and professional community meetings that damage future cooperation. IMPLICATIONS: The study contributes to theory by integrating fragmented insights into the relationship between SR and OI and by proposing empirically derived, context-specific measurement models for both constructs. For practice, it suggests that managers may benefit from a better understanding of how social relationships are associated with organizational innovativeness and how they can be leveraged, while being mindful of potential downsides, such as relational lock-in. ORIGINALITY & VALUE: This research offers a novel, multidimensional examination of the SR–OI relationship within creative industries, introduces a two-dimensional model of OI, and illustrates the application of a rigorous multi-stage data cleaning approach rarely applied in management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Czernek-MarszaÅ‚ek & Patrycja Klimas & Dagmara Wójcik & Patrycja Juszczyk & Aleksandra Szpulak, 2026. "Managers’ social relationships and organizational innovativeness: Insights from creative industries," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 22(2), pages 5-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:22:y:2026:i:2:p:5-51
    DOI: 10.7341/20262221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol22/issue2/JEMI_Vol22_Issue2_2026_Article1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7341/20262221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:22:y:2026:i:2:p:5-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Ujwary-Gil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://fundacjacognitione.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.