IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aae/journl/v21y2025i3p101-124.html

Entrepreneurial well-being research from 1979 to 2022: A comprehensive multimethod bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Sierra Casanova

    (Ph.D., University of Cádiz, Avenida C. Enrique Villegas Vélez, 2, 11002 Cádiz, España)

  • Esthela Galván-Vela

    (Ph.D., Full-time Professor, CETYS University, Av. CETYS Universidad 4, El Lago, 22217 Tijuana, Baja California, México)

  • Mario Alberto Salazar-Altamirano

    (M.A., Doctoral Candidate in Strategic Business Management, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Circuito Universitario s/n, 89337 Tampico, Tamaulipas, México)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the entrepreneurial well-being (EW) field, addressing its evolution, intellectual structure, and emerging trends. It seeks to fill gaps in prior research, which often focuses narrowly on specific dimensions of well-being, by adopting a multidisciplinary and integrative perspective. The study highlights dominant narratives and offers actionable insights for future research and practice. METHODOLOGY: The analysis employs three bibliometric techniques: historiography, document co-citation, and bibliographic coupling. Using 668 primary and 37,951 secondary documents sourced from the Web of Science database, the study spans 1979–2022. Bibliometric tools such as Biblioshiny were applied to identify research clusters, visualise intellectual structures, and assess trends across the field. FINDINGS: The study identifies two dominant narratives: hedonic well-being, focusing on subjective satisfaction and positive emotions, and eudaimonic well-being, centred on psychological constructs like autonomy and purpose. Key contributions are concentrated in journals such as Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. The field exhibits fragmentation, with limited interdisciplinary collaboration, though recent years have seen growing diversity in authorship and geographical representation. IMPLICATIONS: The findings highlight the need for integrating multidisciplinary frameworks to deepen theoretical understanding and promote practical relevance. Stronger collaborations between researchers and practitioners can address challenges like work-life balance and sustainable development. These partnerships can translate academic insights into actionable strategies, benefiting entrepreneurs and society alike. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: This study’s use of three bibliometric techniques offers a unique, comprehensive view of EW research, bridging historical insights with emerging trends. By mapping the field’s intellectual structure, it provides a valuable resource for advancing theoretical and practical contributions in entrepreneurial well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Sierra Casanova & Esthela Galván-Vela & Mario Alberto Salazar-Altamirano, 2025. "Entrepreneurial well-being research from 1979 to 2022: A comprehensive multimethod bibliometric analysis," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 21(3), pages 101-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:101-124
    DOI: 10.7341/20252135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol21/issue3/JEMI_Vol21_Issue3_2025_Article5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7341/20252135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:101-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Ujwary-Gil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://fundacjacognitione.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.