IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/iseicj/v6y2018i0p938-943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardized Nursing Plans And Their Clinical Use

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Mankovecká

    (Department of Clinical Disciplines and Urgent Medicine, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra)

Abstract

This paper states the results of the study on the verification of the applicability of standardized nursing plans in clinical practice. The aim was to develop an effective model of managed nursing care for patients deficient in breathing. The research methods used were: a thought experiment, an experiment, a content analysis, and a survey. From the results, the author suggested four nursing plans which solve actual respiratory deficit. A basis for diagnosis was the classification system of nursing diagnoses NANDA. The plans were verified in two faculty hospitals at clinics of anaesthesiology and intensive medicine. Based on the standardized nursing plans, nursing care quality increased by 19 %. After analysis of the unmet criteria, the author found the most problematic criteria that were inconsistent with the standard. In the last part of the study, a survey of the nurses defined the advantages of standardized plans for nurses and patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Mankovecká, 2018. "Standardized Nursing Plans And Their Clinical Use," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 6(0), pages 938-943, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:6:y:2018:i:0:p:938-943
    DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v6.1275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC/article/view/1275/1818
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/cbup.v6.1275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:6:y:2018:i:0:p:938-943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.