IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/iseicj/v6y2018i0p581-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Effectiveness Factors In The Opinion Of Social Service Representatives – Research Statement

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Grudziewska

    (Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, The Maria Grzegorzewska Pedagogical University)

  • Marta Mikołajczyk

    (Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, The Maria Grzegorzewska Pedagogical University)

Abstract

The subject of the analysis presented in this paper are work effectiveness factors in the opinion of social workers and probation officers. The research was conducted among 121 persons: 64 probation officers executing judgments in family and minors related cases, and 57 social workers. The method of a diagnostic survey was applied during the research. The results show that 62,5% of probation officers consider their work effectiveness as moderate and 31,2% consider their work effective when 64,9% of social workers consider their work moderately effective and 31,6% claim their work is effective. Undoubtedly, the effectiveness of work of both probation officers and social workers depends largely - in the opinion of respondents - on their professional experience and skills, good contacts with the local community in which they work or work autonomy, though the high prestige of the profession is not a factor supporting effectiveness of their work. The presented research results can not refer to the entire population of representatives of these two professions, but they indicate further directions of research on the broadly understood professional identity of representatives of social services inPoland.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Grudziewska & Marta Mikołajczyk, 2018. "Work Effectiveness Factors In The Opinion Of Social Service Representatives – Research Statement," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 6(0), pages 581-588, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:6:y:2018:i:0:p:581-588
    DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v6.1217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC/article/view/1217/1760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/cbup.v6.1217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:6:y:2018:i:0:p:581-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.