IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/iseicj/v5y2017i0p978-982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognostic Value Of Pro-Adrenomedullin, Procalcitonin And C-Reactive Protein In Community Acquired Pneumonia

Author

Listed:
  • Darina Miteva

    (Department of Pulmonology and Allergology, Medical University in Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Yordan Radkov

    (Department of Pulmonology and Allergology, Medical University in Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Lilyia Ivanova

    (Department of Microbiology and Virology, Medical University in Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Trifon Chervenkov

    (Department of Medical Genetics, Medical University in Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Vanya Kostadinova

    (Department of Pulmonology and Allergology, Medical University in Varna, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Introduction: Various biomarkers are used to evaluate the severity and prognosis of community acquired pneumonia (CAP).Objectives: To study and compare the prognostic value of MR-proADM, РСТ and CRP in predicting the severity and outcome of CAP.Methods: A prospective cohort study of 92 patients hospitalized with CAP in the Clinic of Pneumology and Phthisiatrics of MHAT “Saint Marina”–Varna in 2015 was conducted. The biomarkers were measured on admission. Midregional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and procalcitonin (РСТ) were measured by standard ELISA, and C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined by latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay. CAP severity was assessed by CURB-65.Results: Patients were on average 59.2±16.8 years of age; 68.5% of them were male. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.6%. The three biomarkers MR-proADM, РСТ and CRP were significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (0.918±0.045 ng/ml vs. 0.397±0.269ng/ml, р<0.001; 2.14±0.60ng/ml vs. 1.12±0.68ng/ml, р<0.001 and 215.12±96.39 mg/L vs.175.74±221.5mg/L, p<0.05 respectively). In patients who needed intensive care, the biomarkers were also significantly higher than those in patients treated in the general hospital unit (0.509±0.336ng/ml vs. 0.414±0.28ng/ml, р<0.05; 1.92±0.76 ng/ml vs. 1.15±0.70ng/ml, p<0.05 and 221.98±100.34 mg/L vs. 165.31±122.84 mg/L, p<0.05 resp.). MR-proADM and РСТ showed a moderate correlation with the CURB-65 (r=0.33, p<0.01 and r=0.30, p<0.05 respectively). CRP did not correlate with the CURB-65 (r=0.10, p>0.05).Conclusion: MR-proADM, РСТ and CRP were significantly higher in non-survivors and in patients treated in the intensive care unit. MR-proADM and РСТ showed a moderate correlation with the CURB-65, while the correlation coefficient for MR-proADM was higher. CRP did not correlate with the CURB-65.

Suggested Citation

  • Darina Miteva & Yordan Radkov & Lilyia Ivanova & Trifon Chervenkov & Vanya Kostadinova, 2017. "Prognostic Value Of Pro-Adrenomedullin, Procalcitonin And C-Reactive Protein In Community Acquired Pneumonia," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 5(0), pages 978-982, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:5:y:2017:i:0:p:978-982
    DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v5.1055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC/article/view/1055/1603
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/cbup.v5.1055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    MR-proADMРСТ; CRP; CAP; prognosis;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:5:y:2017:i:0:p:978-982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.