IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/iseicj/v4y2016i0p846-851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of Non-Contact Ultrasonic Methods For Defect Estimation Of Composites In Remote Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar Anubhav Tiwari

    (Ultrasound Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas)

  • Renaldas Raisutis

    (Ultrasound Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas)

Abstract

There are various ultrasonic systems, developed for the effective testing and estimation of defect parameters in composite materials. Non-contact ultrasonic testing has already achieved significance over traditional contact methods that require coupling of media and are not well suited for the transmission of surface acoustic waves (SAW), which can cover a large area of structure under investigation. This paper compares approaches of air-coupled transmission/reception, laser ultrasonic, and electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT), for testing and verification of composites and defect estimation in remote areas. It reviews the various practical applications. The study found the hybrid solution, consisting of the laser system as a transmitter and the air-coupled method as a detector, is the best among all.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar Anubhav Tiwari & Renaldas Raisutis, 2016. "Comparative Analysis Of Non-Contact Ultrasonic Methods For Defect Estimation Of Composites In Remote Areas," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 4(0), pages 846-851, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:4:y:2016:i:0:p:846-851
    DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v4.863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC/article/view/863/968
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/cbup.v4.863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:4:y:2016:i:0:p:846-851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.