IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/iseicj/v2y2014i0p293-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review Of Hospital Manager’S Competencies In Astana

Author

Listed:
  • Ayagyoz Umbetzhanova

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Gulmira Derbissalina

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Vitaliy Koikov

    (Republican Centre for Нealth Development, Kazakhstan)

  • Lyazzat Karsakbayeva

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Nasikhat Nurgaliyeva

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Dina Akhmetova

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Bibinur Ibraimova

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Zhanagul Bekbergenova

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Dameli Kassimova

    (Astana Medical University, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Currently, in the Republic of Kazakhstan, the institution of professional managers and transparent forms of health organizations management, including modern management technologies, are being implemented. Thus, sufficient professional competency of managerial decision-makers should be one of the most important factors in ensuring the development of a national health system and implementation of all current reforms in the industry. This article aims to investigate the high relevance of the evaluation of health care manager’s competencies and the development of measures to improve its level.In this cross-sectional study, we have analyzed managerial competencies of different levels of healthcare managers using a special questionnaire, which was developed by EPOS health management group to assess their competencies. We interviewed 61 managers of different levels. On the basis of feedbacks, core competencies and their possession by hospital managers were identified.At the first stage, respondents were asked to assess the importance of different competencies required for their work activity. All levels of management showed the high practical importance of assessed competencies. Results of the basic level demonstrated a practical importance of competencies ranging from 73% to 85%, the middle-level managers were from 83% to 93%, and senior level results were 97% to 98%. The next stage of the survey was an assessment of respondent’s average level of self-esteem for the competencies they possessed. Mid- level managers showed a higher possession of competencies than other levels, from 56.8% to 70.2%; the basic level was from 46.9% to 59.6%; and senior level was from 41.6% to 54.7%. The questionnaire was designed in a way to highlight the training gaps as the difference between the importance attributed to the command of a given piece of knowledge, competency or skills, and the level of proficiency the managers are demonstrating currently. Finally, the third stage assessed the training required, wherein each management level has their specific training requirements. As research shows, senior managers have the highest level of required training. For senior level, the greatest needs for training are “self-management” and “quality management.” For basic level, trainings are in “HR management” and “quality management.” For middle managers, their training needs are in all domains of management.There is a discrepancy between the required and the actual competencies that different levels of health managers’ have. The largest gap between mandatory and existing competences exists at the basic level, in “Personnel Management.” A gap in the mid-level was in “Information and Financial Management”; and it was in “Quality Management” for the senior level. The proposed questionnaire could help to identify the most important training required to fill these gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayagyoz Umbetzhanova & Gulmira Derbissalina & Vitaliy Koikov & Lyazzat Karsakbayeva & Nasikhat Nurgaliyeva & Dina Akhmetova & Bibinur Ibraimova & Zhanagul Bekbergenova & Dameli Kassimova, 2014. "Review Of Hospital Manager’S Competencies In Astana," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 2(0), pages 293-298, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:2:y:2014:i:0:p:293-298
    DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v2.474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC/article/view/474/465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/cbup.v2.474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:2:y:2014:i:0:p:293-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.