IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/iseicj/v1y2013i0p272-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Perceptions Of Aspects Affecting Medical Education Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Katya Peeva

    (Trakia University – Stara Zagora)

  • Georgi Arabadzhiev

    (Trakia University – Stara Zagora)

  • Georgi Yordanov

    (Trakia University – Stara Zagora)

Abstract

The student is the main subject in the education process. The goal of the study is to examine the relative weight of the components of learning process in the students’ evaluation assessment for quality of higher medical education. Direct individual inquiry with rank answers for 541 medical students was completed. Logistic regression analysis was done to create predictive models and derive relationships between quality of education factors and its dependents: assessment of quality and students' progress. Tolerance and respectfulness (OR = 13.1), high general culture (OR = 18.4), clearand accessiblecontemporaryteaching (OR = 9.2), engagement of the audience (OR = 3.4), are the teacher characteristics in the model. Application ofnew technologiesinlearning (OR = 4.2),discussion (OR = 5.9), patients observations and live contact (OR = 5.6) are educational methods determine the qualityof education. Accordinginterns quality of education isdetermined mainly by clinical facilities, quality lectures,solving clinical cases, and practical work.

Suggested Citation

  • Katya Peeva & Georgi Arabadzhiev & Georgi Yordanov, 2013. "Students’ Perceptions Of Aspects Affecting Medical Education Quality," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 1(0), pages 272-278, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:1:y:2013:i:0:p:272-278
    DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v1.44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC/article/view/44/48
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/cbup.v1.44?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:1:y:2013:i:0:p:272-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.