IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i9p257-265id10662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderating effect of reward satisfaction between job overload and emotional labor among nurses in small and medium-sized hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Sooyoung Jun

Abstract

This study investigated how reward satisfaction moderates the relationship between job overload and emotional labor among nurses working in small and medium-sized hospitals (SMHs). A descriptive survey was conducted among 218 nurses from five SMHs. Data were collected using validated Korean versions of scales measuring job overload, emotional labor, and reward satisfaction. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed to examine the moderating effect of reward satisfaction on the relationship between job overload and emotional labor. Control variables included demographic factors such as age, gender, marital status, and clinical experience. Job overload was found to have a significant direct effect on emotional labor (β=0.48, p<.001). Additionally, the interaction between job overload and reward satisfaction significantly influenced emotional labor (β=0.24, p<.01). Reward satisfaction was identified as a key moderator in the relationship between job overload and emotional labor. Enhancing reward satisfaction may play a critical role in reducing the emotional burden caused by job overload. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at improving reward satisfaction could help alleviate the negative impact of job overload on emotional labor among nurses in SMHs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sooyoung Jun, 2025. "The moderating effect of reward satisfaction between job overload and emotional labor among nurses in small and medium-sized hospitals," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(9), pages 257-265.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:9:p:257-265:id:10662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/10662/2564
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:9:p:257-265:id:10662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.