IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i8p257-263id10586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why would an ethically proven Shockvertising campaign backfire so aggressively? Ethics boundaries in advertising and audience’s perspective case study: Spinneys “missing” advertising campaign Lebanon 2025

Author

Listed:
  • Josiane El Khoury

Abstract

In advertising campaigns, particularly billboards, brands resort to using attention-grabbing techniques to capture the audience’s focus and manipulate consumer behavior. Multiple categories can also be employed to convey a message within a single campaign. These categories range from shock advertising, engagement advertising, teaser advertising, reveal advertising, and many others. This is precisely what the Spinneys campaign tended to achieve in announcing its new branch, employing these advertising techniques. This campaign initiated a wave of discontent on social media and in society. That wave quickly turned aggressive, bombarding the campaign with criticism. Many argued that, in a country already facing war and uncertainty, a commercial campaign that plays on the theme of “missing people” could feel harmful and trigger deep fear among citizens. However, the ethical boundaries of these advertising categories vary according to several factors, such as the audience’s psychology and background, as well as the manner in which the campaign is executed, including its visuals, language, and other elements. The findings of this study highlight the ethical boundaries of these types of advertising, as well as how to maintain responsibility toward society while achieving creativity and leaving an impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Josiane El Khoury, 2025. "Why would an ethically proven Shockvertising campaign backfire so aggressively? Ethics boundaries in advertising and audience’s perspective case study: Spinneys “missing” advertising campaign Lebanon ," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(8), pages 257-263.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:8:p:257-263:id:10586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/10586/2532
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:8:p:257-263:id:10586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.