IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i7p292-308id10437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dam risk management framework on the lifecycle of dam: A comparative analysis in a legislation perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Anissa Mayangsari

  • Dwita Sutjiningsih

  • Eko Winar Irianto

  • Mahawan Karuniasa

Abstract

Dams play essential roles in water management and produce renewable energy but pose high potential risks, not only for communities downstream of the dam but also for economic and environmental damage. Risk management is an effort to reduce dam risks by knowing the measurable risk factors in a dam. Several countries have adopted risk management as one of the cycles in ensuring dam safety and include it in applicable regulations and guidelines. Using the comparative analysis method, this paper will compare risk management regarding regulations and guidelines in the context of dam safety in various countries such as New Zealand, India, Spain, and Indonesia. These results show that dam hazard classification is the primary basis for determining design, construction, operation, and maintenance criteria, such as design flood design and earthquake analysis. All of the countries stated that risk management is mandatory in the lifecycle of the dam, but only Indonesia still makes it voluntary. Guidelines on risk analysis have been prepared in each country to explain the legislation and regulations that have been established. Considering the current conditions where society demands transparency in decision-making, dam risk assessment as a method to assess risk-based information is essential, and regulations related to risk management should be made mandatory in the lifecycle of dams.

Suggested Citation

  • Anissa Mayangsari & Dwita Sutjiningsih & Eko Winar Irianto & Mahawan Karuniasa, 2025. "Dam risk management framework on the lifecycle of dam: A comparative analysis in a legislation perspective," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(7), pages 292-308.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:7:p:292-308:id:10437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/10437/2467
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:7:p:292-308:id:10437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.