IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i6p489-500id9637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging the cognitive conflict-based learning model to deepen students’ understanding of momentum and collisions

Author

Listed:
  • Sumethawee Kongmai

  • Kanyarat Cojorn

  • Yuttapon Pulputtha

Abstract

A solid conceptual understanding of physics is essential for students to internalize fundamental principles and engage effectively in higher-order scientific thinking. Recognizing the importance of this, the present study aimed to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of Momentum and Collisions using Cognitive Conflict-Based Learning (CCBL). This study collected data from Grade 10 students using a two-tier conceptual understanding test, comprising multiple-choice questions and corresponding open-ended items that required reasoning. The test assessed seven sub-concepts: Momentum, Force and Change in Momentum, Impulse and Impulsive Force, the Law of Conservation of Momentum, Elastic Collisions, Inelastic Collisions, and Explosion. The results showed that 30 students (76.92%) achieved Partial Understanding (PU) or Complete Understanding (CU), and 9 students (23.08%) achieved Partial Understanding with Specific Alternative Conception (PS). Out of all the sub-concepts, the most significant number of students achieving Complete Understanding (CU) was for the concepts of Momentum and Explosion, with 22 students (56.41%) for each. Conversely, the fewest number of students with a Complete Understanding (CU) was in the concept of Impulse and Impulsive Force, where 14 students (35.90%) were found. Cumulatively, the findings confirm the potential of CCBL for addressing misconceptions and enabling conceptual learning in physics. Practical implications include designing lessons that integrate discrepant events, guided discussions, and technology-based tools such as simulations and video analysis, alongside focused support for difficult sub-concepts. These insights highlight the value of CCBL as a constructivist approach for enhancing physics education.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumethawee Kongmai & Kanyarat Cojorn & Yuttapon Pulputtha, 2025. "Leveraging the cognitive conflict-based learning model to deepen students’ understanding of momentum and collisions," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 489-500.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:6:p:489-500:id:9637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/9637/2172
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:6:p:489-500:id:9637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.