IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i6p3385-3401id10359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compatibility assessment of rhamnolipid biosurfactant with reservoir fluids and minerals of sandstone

Author

Listed:
  • Nugroho Marsiyanto

  • Ildrem Syafri

  • Abdurrokhim Abdurrokhim

  • Suryo Prakoso

  • Mahruri Sanmurjana

Abstract

As Indonesia’s mature oil fields decline, biosurfactant-based Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) offers a sustainable alternative. This study evaluates the compatibility of rhamnolipid biosurfactant with reservoir fluids and mineralogy of sandstone using Buff Berea Sandstone Sample. Tests were conducted at 0–7.5% rhamnolipid concentrations in brines with salinities of 5000–30,000 ppm NaCl. Rhamnolipid remained stable at high salinities and 60 °C. Mineralogical analysis confirmed quartz dominance (>70%) with reactive silicates influencing biosurfactant retention. IFT decreased significantly with increasing rhamnolipid concentration, most notably between 0% and 1.5%, with greater reduction in light oils. Viscosity increases were prominent in medium oil at medium–high salinity, reaching 18–20 cP, indicating improved mobility control. pH remained stable (5–6), safe for reservoir applications. Contact angle tests showed light oil had higher wettability (15.07°) than medium oil (25.05°), with medium oil offering higher mobilization potential under surfactant-assisted recovery. Results demonstrate rhamnolipid’s strong potential as an efficient, environmentally friendly EOR agent, with chemical and mineralogical compatibility supporting its application in Indonesian oil fields. This integrated evaluation provides insights into biosurfactant behavior in realistic geological conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nugroho Marsiyanto & Ildrem Syafri & Abdurrokhim Abdurrokhim & Suryo Prakoso & Mahruri Sanmurjana, 2025. "Compatibility assessment of rhamnolipid biosurfactant with reservoir fluids and minerals of sandstone," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 3385-3401.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:6:p:3385-3401:id:10359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/10359/2432
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:6:p:3385-3401:id:10359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.