Author
Listed:
- Aizhan Nazyrova
- Aikerim Nasrullayeva
- Assel Mukanova
- Aigerim Buribayeva
- Banu Yergesh
Abstract
This study aims to conduct a comparative evaluation of classical and transformer-based sentiment analysis models applied to Kazakh-Russian bilingual texts, addressing the gap in resource-efficient NLP solutions for low-resource languages. Three models were implemented and evaluated: (1) Word2Vec with a two-layer neural network, (2) BERT (rubert-base-cased), and (3) DistilBERT (distilrubert-tiny). A balanced dataset of 226,000 bilingual comments was used. The models were compared using key performance indicators, including F1-score, accuracy, computational efficiency, inference speed, model size, and energy consumption. Results show that BERT achieved the highest accuracy (F1 = 0.90), but with significant computational and memory costs. DistilBERT provided nearly identical accuracy (F1 = 0.89) with substantially reduced resource requirements, while Word2Vec achieved lower accuracy (F1 = 0.81) but demonstrated superior speed and energy efficiency. Error analysis revealed consistent challenges across models in handling negation, sarcasm, idiomatic expressions, and code-mixed language. The findings confirm that lightweight transformer models, particularly DistilBERT, provide a favorable trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. Word2Vec remains a viable option for real-time and embedded applications, while BERT, although accurate, is less practical for resource-constrained environments. This study contributes to the advancement of Green AI principles by demonstrating how efficient sentiment analysis systems can be developed for low-resource languages. The proposed dataset and evaluation framework can serve as a benchmark for future Kazakh-Russian NLP research and practical applications, including mobile services, e-Government platforms, and education technologies.
Suggested Citation
Aizhan Nazyrova & Aikerim Nasrullayeva & Assel Mukanova & Aigerim Buribayeva & Banu Yergesh, 2025.
"Multilingual thematic modeling: A comparative study of classical and transformational approaches,"
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 2787-2799.
Handle:
RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:6:p:2787-2799:id:10204
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:6:p:2787-2799:id:10204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.