IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i5p741-751id8817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring mathematics teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Ariesta Kartika Sari
  • Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono
  • Agung Lukito

Abstract

This study aims to explore teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking and strategies to develop students’ algorithmic thinking skills. This study is a qualitative research using a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through a questionnaire and an interview. In the data analysis process, we used the first cycle and second cycle coding techniques with NVivo. The findings show that both teachers and lecturers perceive algorithmic thinking as the ability to think of procedures for solving problems algorithmically, logically, and systematically. Participants shared the same perception that algorithmic thinking helps students engage in solving mathematics-related problems in context-oriented and problem-based learning activities. Several efforts offered by participants to improve algorithmic thinking skills include optimizing problem-solving and contextual learning activities, and creating concept maps in teaching and learning activities. Participants also believed that algorithmic thinking encompasses cognitive thinking abilities, such as abstraction and decomposition, in addition to its advantages and applications. The theoretical contributions of the research include the concept of algorithmic thinking, its advantages and implications for daily activities and solving mathematical problems, and efforts to enhance algorithmic thinking abilities. In the future, there is an opportunity to conduct research related to exploring the aspects of algorithmic thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariesta Kartika Sari & Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono & Agung Lukito, 2025. "Exploring mathematics teachers’ and lecturers’ perceptions of algorithmic thinking," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 741-751.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:741-751:id:8817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/8817/1992
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:741-751:id:8817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.