IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i5p2063-2074id9371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formation of students' written scientific speech in chemistry: A comparative study of scaffolding strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Tatyana Mitina
  • Irina Afanasenkova
  • Natalya Bazarnova
  • Olga Ovchinnikova
  • Tatyana Sheiko

Abstract

The development of scientific writing in school chemistry represents a crucial direction in modern pedagogy, aimed at fostering students’ skills in academic argumentation, meaningful structuring of knowledge, and subject-specific language literacy. In this study, we examine various scaffold strategies (cognitive, linguistic, and hybrid) and propose an original model, SWC (Scientific Writing in Chemistry), which integrates pedagogical and cognitive mechanisms for the formation of scientific writing. Our model is based on a seven-step scaffold support algorithm and combines genre-based, process-oriented, and content-language approaches. A comparative theoretical study has been conducted with visual and tabular verification of the SWC model’s effectiveness across key parameters: cognitive load, language support, scientific accuracy, and cross-disciplinarity. We present algorithms, task templates, methodological guidelines, and a risk table. Our findings demonstrate that SWC is a pedagogically balanced and functional model for developing scientific writing in the context of chemistry education.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatyana Mitina & Irina Afanasenkova & Natalya Bazarnova & Olga Ovchinnikova & Tatyana Sheiko, 2025. "Formation of students' written scientific speech in chemistry: A comparative study of scaffolding strategies," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 2063-2074.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:2063-2074:id:9371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/9371/2105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:2063-2074:id:9371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.