Author
Listed:
- Nguyen Huu The
- Tran Thanh Du
- Huynh Thi Bich Phuong
- Au Minh Triet
- Nguyen Hoang Trung Chanh
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of the top-down approach on students’ reading proficiency and motivation. The top-down approach activates students' background knowledge, also known as schemata, to enhance reading comprehension. According to Anderson [1] the terms schemata, background knowledge, and prior knowledge can be used interchangeably. The primary objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of the top-down approach in improving students' reading skills and to examine its influence on their motivation to read. To obtain the data, a 12-week study was conducted as a field study at a high school using a mixed-methods approach that combined qualitative and quantitative analyses. This study included two 11th-grade classes (N=80): Class 11C3 functioned as the control group, following the traditional bottom-up approach, whereas Class 11C4 functioned as the experimental group, receiving instruction using the top-down approach. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS to compare the outcomes of the pre-test and post-test, as well as the questionnaires measuring students’ reading motivation before and after applying the top-down approach. Additionally, student interviews were conducted to gather qualitative data, which offered valuable insights into the learning process and students’ reading motivation. The findings indicate that the top-down approach significantly enhances students’ reading comprehension and motivation compared to the bottom-up method. Further investigation is recommended to examine the enduring impacts of the top-down approach on reading abilities in various educational settings.
Suggested Citation
Nguyen Huu The & Tran Thanh Du & Huynh Thi Bich Phuong & Au Minh Triet & Nguyen Hoang Trung Chanh, 2025.
"Improving reading skills through top-down approach: A case study in a high school in Vietnam,"
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 1825-1838.
Handle:
RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:1825-1838:id:9299
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:1825-1838:id:9299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.