IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i5p157-167id8577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GenAI potential and challenges in programming knowledge control

Author

Listed:
  • Zhanat Nurbekova
  • Ainur Sagimbayeva
  • Asset Zhaxylykov
  • Esen Bidaibekov

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the potential and challenges associated with the use of GenAI (generative artificial intelligence) in the automated verification and formation of students' programming knowledge assessments. In terms of methodology, this study employs a mixed approach: analyzing the functionality of popular generative models and platforms for competitive programming (Codeforces, LeetCode, HackerRank), as well as comparing their applicability to various task formats and types of knowledge (syntactic, semantic, logical). The possibilities of such systems in providing adaptive feedback, automating routine checks, and supporting individualized training are considered. It was revealed that, despite advantages such as scalability, interactivity, and the ability to generate contextually relevant content, there are significant limitations, including risks of incorrect assessment, vulnerability to model deception, lack of pedagogical interpretation of results, and potential dependence of students on AI assistance. In conclusion, the need to develop regulatory, pedagogical, and technical frameworks that ensure the ethical and responsible application of GenAI in programming knowledge assessment systems is emphasized.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhanat Nurbekova & Ainur Sagimbayeva & Asset Zhaxylykov & Esen Bidaibekov, 2025. "GenAI potential and challenges in programming knowledge control," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 157-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:157-167:id:8577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/8577/1938
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:157-167:id:8577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.