IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i4p819-831id7953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI-generated text in academic writing: Balancing structural proficiency and intellectual autonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Gohar Rahman
  • Badri Abdulhakim Mudhsh
  • Eqab Ali A. Almutairi
  • Marouan Kouki

Abstract

As generative AI tools like ChatGPT-4 become more common in higher education, their impact on student writing demands critical attention. This study investigates how AI-assisted composition influences undergraduate academic writing, focusing on structure, evidence use, and critical thinking. Drawing on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and Sweller’s Cognitive Load Theory, a randomized controlled trial was conducted with 50 first-year students. Participants were divided into two groups: one using ChatGPT-4 during essay writing and another working independently. Essays were evaluated using Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Results showed that AI-assisted essays scored higher in organization (M = 4.3 vs. 3.2) and thesis clarity (M = 4.5 vs. 3.0), but lower in critical engagement (M = 2.9 vs. 3.6). Qualitative findings revealed that while AI users appreciated its efficiency, 74% expressed concerns about overreliance. Non-AI writers reported stronger conceptual understanding developed through personal effort. Although 75% of AI-assisted essays included peer-reviewed sources, only 37% of users verified them. These results suggest that AI enhances surface-level fluency but may weaken independent reasoning. The study calls for pedagogical strategies that position AI as a writing aid—not a replacement—while fostering critical thinking and academic integrity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gohar Rahman & Badri Abdulhakim Mudhsh & Eqab Ali A. Almutairi & Marouan Kouki, 2025. "AI-generated text in academic writing: Balancing structural proficiency and intellectual autonomy," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 819-831.
    • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:819-831:id:7953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/7953/1751
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:819-831:id:7953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.