IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i4p2205-2218id8357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of questionnaires on the evaluation of the quality of LMS platforms in the university context using the modified DELPHI method

Author

Listed:
  • Janeth Mora Secaira
  • Raúl Díaz Ocampo
  • Francisco P. Rodríguez Miranda

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate questionnaires aimed at students, faculty, and administrators to evaluate the quality of Learning Management System (LMS) platforms in university contexts. A methodological design based on the modified Delphi method was adopted, applied in two rounds of consultation with 12 experts in educational technology, pedagogy, instructional design, and digital platform management. The items were evaluated based on criteria of clarity and relevance using a Likert scale, and analyzed through descriptive statistics, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient, and Cronbach’s Alpha. The findings show high levels of agreement among experts (Cohen’s Kappa > 0.75) and high internal reliability of the questionnaires (α > 0.94), demonstrating the robustness of the instruments developed. The multidimensional validation (technical, pedagogical, usability, and administrative) made it possible to construct comprehensive and coherent tools aligned with the current needs of digital higher education. It is concluded that the validated questionnaires are suitable for evaluating the quality of LMS platforms from different institutional perspectives. As a practical implication, these questionnaires can be used by universities to diagnose strengths and weaknesses in their LMS platforms, facilitating continuous improvement processes and evidence-based decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Janeth Mora Secaira & Raúl Díaz Ocampo & Francisco P. Rodríguez Miranda, 2025. "Validation of questionnaires on the evaluation of the quality of LMS platforms in the university context using the modified DELPHI method," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 2205-2218.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:2205-2218:id:8357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/8357/1875
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:2205-2218:id:8357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.