Author
Listed:
- Gezta Nasafir Hermawan
- Bismarck Joel Laihad
- Frank Mitchell Marvel Wagey
- Suzanna Patricia Mongan
- Bella Aprilia
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological cancers, often diagnosed in recurrent or advanced stages. Despite various advances in chemotherapy, high mortality and morbidity persist. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recent targeted therapies used alongside chemotherapy in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, especially in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) cases. This study was conducted to compare the use of ICI, TKI, and standard chemotherapy regimens (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and/or Doxorubicin) in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer cases with known mismatch repair (MMR) status based on recent evidence. Searching and selection were conducted in adherence to the PRISMA statement across various databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Selected studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Eligible studies were extracted for characteristics and outcomes. The primary outcome of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), with the secondary outcome being overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis of mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and proficient (pMMR) cases was performed. A network meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of good quality were included. The analysis found that the ICI plus chemotherapy combination regimen provided better PFS compared to the chemotherapy-only regimen in dMMR-EC subjects (OR = 0.021; 95% CI = 0.003–0.140), but not in pMMR-EC subjects. There was no significant difference in PFS between the ICI plus TKI combination regimen and ICI monotherapy compared to chemotherapy-only. No difference in OS was observed among all groups. Adverse events were higher in the ICI plus chemotherapy combination regimen, but no differences in quality of life or discontinuation rates were noted. ICI plus chemotherapy provided better PFS compared to chemotherapy alone, ICI monotherapy, and ICI plus TKI regimens, respectively in dMMR primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer cases. PROSPERO ID: CRD42023472033.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:1223-1232:id:8050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.