Author
Listed:
- Najoua El Abbas El Ghaleb
- Ikram El Hachimi
- Sanae Mehdi
- Rajaa Bazarouj
- Fadoua Laghzaoui
Abstract
This study investigates the limitations of traditional evaluation methods, particularly Likert-type scales, in capturing complex, subjective constructs such as organizational agility and value co-creation within public service delivery. It proposes an alternative framework grounded in fuzzy logic theory to better reflect the nuanced perceptions of stakeholders. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with public sector agents in Moroccan territorial administrations. Respondents evaluated service attributes using a self-anchored “free scale” and linguistic descriptors. These evaluations were transformed into triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) and analyzed using fuzzy similarity indices and scale invariance testing (D-test). The fuzzy logic-based method revealed significant perceptual differences not captured by the standard 5-point Likert scale. Semantic differential scales showed stronger alignment with the free scale. Findings replicated across samples confirmed the increased representational sensitivity and reduced distortion in perceptual data using fuzzy logic. Fuzzy logic offers a more flexible and theoretically robust alternative to traditional fixed-point scales in assessing subjective dimensions of public service, enhancing accuracy in measuring perceived service quality and co-creation. The study emphasizes the importance of measurement choice in public administration research. Applying fuzzy logic can yield richer, more actionable insights for policy design, performance evaluation, and citizen engagement strategies.
Suggested Citation
Najoua El Abbas El Ghaleb & Ikram El Hachimi & Sanae Mehdi & Rajaa Bazarouj & Fadoua Laghzaoui, 2025.
"Enhancing public service agility and value co-creation through fuzzy logic integration algorithms,"
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 110-122.
Handle:
RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:110-122:id:7743
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:110-122:id:7743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.