IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i3p817-825id6616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A corpus-based study of Howard Goldblatt’s translation style in his English rendering of the Shanhaijing

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Zhong
  • Minghui Long

Abstract

The classic work, Shanhaijing, is a seminal work in ancient Chinese literature, celebrated for its mysticism and profound depth. Its English translation plays a pivotal role in helping the international community understand Chinese mythological culture, and an analysis of its translation style can offer valuable insights and references for the translation of similar classical texts. Therefore, this study aims to examine Howard Goldblatt’s English translation of Shanhaijing, focusing on his translational style and its effect on the comprehension of English-speaking readers. Utilizing corpus tools such as WordSmith, AntConc, and Readability Analyzers, the study conducts a quantitative comparison of translations by Goldblatt, Anne Birrell, and Wang Hong. The analysis combines literature review and corpus-based methods to examine Goldblatt’s translation style in terms of word frequency, type-token ratio, mean word and sentence length, and readability. The research reveals that Goldblatt demonstrates a rich lexical variety, employing straightforward yet precise and nuanced syntax. Overall, Howard Goldblatt successfully preserved the cultural essence of the original text while enhancing the expressiveness and richness of the translation, thereby deepening English readers’ understanding and appreciation of this classic work. The findings provide significant guidance for the international communication of classical texts and offer effective approaches on how to make classic works more accessible to international readers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Zhong & Minghui Long, 2025. "A corpus-based study of Howard Goldblatt’s translation style in his English rendering of the Shanhaijing," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 817-825.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:817-825:id:6616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/6616/1296
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:817-825:id:6616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.