IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i3p3344-3355id7242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence tools perceptions: A survey to measure the Perceptions of Engineering Students

Author

Listed:
  • Ala’a M. Al-Falahat

Abstract

This research intends to evaluate the usage and impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in engineering education through a cross-sectional study using a web-based questionnaire distributed to 290 undergraduate and graduate students. The objective is to assess the students' perceptions toward AI tools, which AI uses in their education and future jobs, its prospects and challenges, and their experiences with AI applications. The results indicated high acceptance of general-purpose AI applications in engineering, such as ChatGPT (50.7% regular use) and Grammarly (65.9%), while lower acceptance exists for specialized AI applications in engineering. Students see the use of AI as beneficial for improving academic performance, especially in writing technical reports (94.1% agreement) and research (86.6% agreement). The study found that 87.6% of students agreed that AI gives them an edge in courses and projects. However, 65.5% of the respondents were concerned about ethics and felt traditional skills in problem-solving should be upheld. Attitudes toward AI tools and the way they are used showed statistically significant differences across academic levels and years in the program, pointing toward the necessity of tailored teaching methods. While underlining the transformative potential of AI in engineering education, the study emphasizes the need to address ethical considerations and find a middle ground between promoting AI-assisted learning and developing traditional skill sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ala’a M. Al-Falahat, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence tools perceptions: A survey to measure the Perceptions of Engineering Students," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 3344-3355.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:3344-3355:id:7242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/7242/1517
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:3344-3355:id:7242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.