IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/bla/stratm/v26y2005i4p297-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Conceptualizing executive hubris: the role of (hyper‐)core self‐evaluations in strategic decision‐making

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
  2. Rameshan Pallikara, 2020. "Crisis Leadership of World Leaders: Anecdotal Evidence from Global Covid-19 Fightback," Working papers 385, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
  3. Stevo Pavićević & Thomas Keil, 2021. "The role of procedural rationality in debiasing acquisition decisions of overconfident CEOs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1696-1715, September.
  4. Radoslaw Nowak, 2018. "Executive’S Personality And Group Performance: The Mediating Role Of Absorptive Capacity," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(06), pages 1-29, August.
  5. Johannes Brunzel, 2021. "Overconfidence and narcissism among the upper echelons: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 585-623, July.
  6. Jaehyung Ahn & Soojin Lee & Seokhwa Yun, 2018. "Leaders’ Core Self-evaluation, Ethical Leadership, and Employees’ Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Employees’ Exchange Ideology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 457-470, March.
  7. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
  8. Eyal Eckhaus & Zachary Sheaffer, 2018. "Managerial hubris detection: the case of Enron," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 304-325, November.
  9. Matteo Cristofaro & Pier Luigi Giardino, 2020. "Core Self-Evaluations, Self-Leadership, and the Self-Serving Bias in Managerial Decision Making: A Laboratory Experiment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, September.
  10. Hutzschenreuter, Thomas & Kleindienst, Ingo, 2013. "(How) Does discretion change over time? A contribution toward a dynamic view of managerial discretion," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 264-281.
  11. Fox, Stephen & Groesser, Stefan N., 2016. "Reframing the relevance of research to practice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 457-465.
  12. Jingchen Ma & Xu Huang, 2023. "Knowledge-Based Faultlines and Corporate Social Irresponsibility: Evidence from Chinese High-Polluting Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, September.
  13. von den Driesch, Till & Eva Susanne da Costa, Maika & Christina Flatten, Tessa & Brettel, Malte, 2015. "How CEO experience, personality, and network affect firms' dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 245-256.
  14. Runesson, Emmeli & Samani, Niuosha, 2023. "Goodwill or “No-will”: Hubris in the tone at the top," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
  15. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
  16. Weifeng Xu & Qingsong Ruan & Chang Liu, 2019. "Can the Famous University Experience of Top Managers Improve Corporate Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
  17. Gerald Yong Gao & Danny Tan Wang & Yi Che, 2018. "Impact of historical conflict on FDI location and performance: Japanese investment in China," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(8), pages 1060-1080, October.
  18. Zabara, Tatiana, 2019. "Evolution of entrepreneurial teams in technology-based new ventures," Other publications TiSEM cc09d065-3811-47b6-9c93-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  19. Ying-Jiuan Wong & Chi-Feng Wang, 2018. "Is an overconfident CEO good for advertising investments?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(3), pages 439-455, August.
  20. Prashantham, Shameen & Floyd, Steven W., 2019. "Navigating liminality in new venture internationalization," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 513-527.
  21. Kenneth Yung & Xiang Long, 2022. "CEO overconfidence and the adjustment speed of leverage and cash: evidence on cash is not the same as negative debt," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 1081-1108, August.
  22. Haeyoung Koo & Choelsoon Park, 2018. "Foundation of leadership in Asia: Leader characteristics and leadership styles review and research agenda," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 697-718, September.
  23. Andreas Hönl & Philip Meissner & Torsten Wulf, 2020. "Betting the farm and playing it safe? Hyper-core self-evaluation in decisions when managers are winning and losing," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1293-1316, November.
  24. MinChung Kim & Guiyang Xiong & Kwang-Ho Kim, 2018. "Where does pride lead? Corporate managerial hubris and strategic emphasis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 537-556, May.
  25. Ismail, Ahmad & Mavis, Christos P., 2022. "A new method for measuring CEO overconfidence: Evidence from acquisitions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  26. Lu Zhang & Shenggang Ren & Xiaohong Chen & Dayuan Li & Duanjinyu Yin, 2020. "CEO Hubris and Firm Pollution: State and Market Contingencies in a Transitional Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 459-478, January.
  27. Hong Tian & Ao Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Frugal Innovation: The Moderating Role of Organizational Innovation Climate," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
  28. Sam S. S. Lau & Kelvin Wan & Martin Tsui, 2021. "Evaluation of a Blended Career Education Course during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Students’ Career Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
  29. Michaela Wrede & Tobias Dauth, 2020. "A temporal perspective on the relationship between top management team internationalization and firms' innovativeness," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 542-561, June.
  30. Jiang, Shuiquan & Yang, Jie & Yu, Mingchuan & Lin, Han & Li, Chao & Doty, Harold, 2022. "Strategic conformity, organizational learning ambidexterity, and corporate innovation performance: An inverted U-shaped curve?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 424-433.
  31. Lin, Fengyi & Lin, Sheng-Wei & Fang, Wen-Chang, 2022. "Impact of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate sustainability and firm performance," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
  32. Loureiro, Gilberto & Makhija, Anil K. & Zhang, Dan, 2020. "One dollar CEOs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 425-439.
  33. Paul P. Momtaz, 2021. "CEO emotions and firm valuation in initial coin offerings: An artificial emotional intelligence approach," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 558-578, March.
  34. Eva Crespo-Cebada & Carlos Díaz-Caro & Aurora E. Rabazo-Martín & Edilberto J. Rodríguez-Rivero, 2021. "Do Narcissistic Managers Prefer Incentive Systems Based on Financial Instruments? An Analysis Based on Choice Experiments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
  35. Maximilian H. Theissen & Hubertus H. Theissen, 2020. "CEO Hubris and Firm Pollution: A Tricky Relationship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 411-416, June.
  36. Tang, Jianyun, 2021. "CEO self-discipline in power use: A key moderator for the effect of CEO power," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 633-644.
  37. Vita Akstinaite & Graham Robinson & Eugene Sadler-Smith, 2020. "Linguistic Markers of CEO Hubris," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 687-705, December.
  38. Conan L. Hom & Daniel Samson & Peter B. Cebon & Christina Cregan, 2021. "Inside the black box: an investigation of non-executive director activity through the lens of dynamic capability," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 857-895, September.
  39. Gianpaolo Abatecola & Matteo Cristofaro, 2019. "Ingredients of Sustainable CEO Behaviour: Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
  40. Matteo Cristofaro & Pier Luigi Giardino & Luna Leoni, 2020. "The Influence of Core Self-Evaluations on Group Decision Making Processes: A Laboratory Experiment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, May.
  41. Janina Sundermeier & Tyge-F. Kummer, 2022. "Does personality still matter in e-commerce? How perceived hubris influences the assessment of founders’ trustworthiness using the example of reward-based crowdfunding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1127-1144, September.
  42. Boss, Alan D. & Yan, Jiaju & Reger, Rhonda K., 2023. "Keep on keeping on: A psychological approach to entrepreneurial persistence," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
  43. Pallikara Rameshan, 2021. "Crisis Leadership of Covid-19 Fightback: Exploratory Anecdotal Evidence on Selected World Leaders," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 136-159, July.
  44. Andreea N. Kiss & Dirk Libaers & Pamela S. Barr & Tang Wang & Miles A. Zachary, 2020. "CEO cognitive flexibility, information search, and organizational ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2200-2233, December.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.