Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Evaluierung und Arbeitsmarktpolitik: eine analytischer Bezugsrahmen am Beispiel des arbeitsmarktpolitischen Rahmenprogramms in Berlin

Contents:

Author Info

  • Schmid, Günther
  • Schömann, Klaus
  • Schütz, Holger
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Die vorliegende Studie entwickelt einen analytischen Bezugsrahmen für eine idealtypische Evaluierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik. Zur Illustration dient das Arbeitsmarktpolitische Rahmenprogramm der Berliner Landesregierung. Dabei standen die vom Europäischen Sozialfonds kofinanzierten Qualifizierungsprogramme im Vordergrund. In einem Bezugsrahmen wird noch keine eigentliche Evaluierung vorgenommen. Es werden lediglich die zentralen Fragen entwickelt, die wichtigen Begriffe (wie Mitnahme, Verdrängung, Substitution, tangible und intangible Kosten) definiert, die möglichen Methoden und Verfahren diskutiert sowie die entsprechenden Datenvoraussetzungen für eine umfassende Evaluierung genannt. Da und dort werden jedoch einzelne Schritte beispielhaft ausgeführt, und an manchen Stellen werden Vermutungen geäußert, um die Art der erwarteten Informationen oder Argumente zu verdeutlichen. Theoretische oder praktische Beispiele sowie Literaturhinweise geben Anregungen zur weiteren Vertiefung und Anwendung. Es werden fünf Etappen eines vollständigen Evaluierungsprozesses der Arbeitsmarktpolitik unterschieden und ausgeführt: (1) Kontextanalyse, (2) Problemanalyse, (3) Monitoring, (4) Wirkungsanalyse und (5) Nutzen-Kosten- Analyse. -- The present study develops an analytical framework for a model evaluation of labour market policy. The Labour Market Policy Framework Programme of the Berlin government serves for illustration. Special attention is given to training programmes co-financed by the European Social Fund. Strictly speaking, an analytical framework is not yet an evaluation. It only develops the central questions, defines important terms (such as deadweight, displacement, substitution, tangible and intangible costs), discusses possible methods and procedures and names the data requirements for a complete evaluation. Some steps are exemplified and concrete assumptions are sometimes formulated to clarify the kind of informations or arguments expected. Theoretical and practical examples as well as bibliographical references are provided to stimulate further research and application. Five steps of a complete evaluation process are distinguished: (1) context analysis, (2) problem analysis, (3) monitoring, (4) impact analysis and (5) cost-benefit-analysis.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43922/1/231945558.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) in its series Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment with number FS I 97-204.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 1997
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:fsi97204

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Reichpietschufer 50, 10785 Berlin, Germany
    Phone: ++49 - 30 - 25491 - 0
    Fax: ++49 - 30 - 25491 - 684
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.wzb.eu/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Ashenfelter, Orley C, 1978. "Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 60(1), pages 47-57, February.
    2. Kurt Geppert & Dieter Vesper, 1995. "Länderfusion begünstigt Entwicklung: wirtschaftliche und finanzpolitische Aspekte einer Vereinigung von Berlin und Brandenburg," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 62(10), pages 215-227.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:fsi97204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.