IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ufzdps/72015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gesellschaftliche Grundfragen der Bioökonomie: Volkswirtschaftliche Mehrwerte und Nachhaltigkeitsherausforderungen einer biobasierten Wirtschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Pannicke, Nadine
  • Hagemann, Nina
  • Purkus, Alexandra
  • Gawel, Erik

Abstract

[Problemstellung] Mit dem noch jungen und wenig konturierten Konzept der Bioökonomie verbindet sich eine Vielzahl an politischen und sozio-ökonomischen Zielstellungen und Erwartungen. Diese umfassen die dauerhafte Sicherung der Rohstoffbasis unserer Wirtschaftsweise, den Ressourcen- und Klimaschutz, eine insgesamt nachhaltige Umgestaltung von Produktion und Konsum und zugleich eine Unterstützung der in Gang gekommenen Energiewende. Konkrete wirtschaftspolitische Ziele wie die Steigerung der regionalen Wertschöpfung und wirtschaftliches Wachstum gehören ebenfalls dazu (BMEL 2014a). In diesem Diskussionspapier soll untersucht werden, welche Erwartungen aus gesellschaftlicher, politischer, ökonomischer und wissenschaftlicher Perspektive in die Bioökonomie gesetzt werden und welchen Herausforderungen sich eine darauf ausgerichtete Bioökonomiepolitik gegenübersieht, insbesondere welche Zielkonflikte ggf. resultieren. Des Weiteren werden die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Bioökonomie dargelegt sowie volkswirtschaftliche Mehrwerte biobasierten Wirtschaftens und deren Nachhaltigkeitsherausforderungen identifiziert. Aus einer ökonomischen Perspektive werden insbesondere die Herausforderungen eines Pfadübergangs von einer auf fossilen Rohstoffen fußenden Wirtschaftsweise hin zu einer biobasierten Kreislaufwirtschaft skizziert werden. [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Pannicke, Nadine & Hagemann, Nina & Purkus, Alexandra & Gawel, Erik, 2015. "Gesellschaftliche Grundfragen der Bioökonomie: Volkswirtschaftliche Mehrwerte und Nachhaltigkeitsherausforderungen einer biobasierten Wirtschaft," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2015, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:72015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/109649/1/822941260.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ludwig, Grit & Tronicke, Cornelius & Köck, Wolfgang & Gawel, Erik, 2014. "Rechtsrahmen der Bioökonomie in Mitteldeutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und Bewertung," UFZ Discussion Papers 22/2014, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    2. Thieme, Paula & Dittrich, Dennis Alexis Valin, 2015. "A life-span perspective on life satisfaction," MPRA Paper 64700, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Unruh, Gregory C., 2000. "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 817-830, October.
    4. Efken, Josef & Banse, Martin & Rothe, Andrea & Dieter, Matthias & Dirksmeyer, Walter & Ebeling, Michael & Fluck, Katrin & Hansen, Heiko & Kreins, Peter & Seintsch, Bjorn & Schweinle, Jorg & Strohm, Ka, 2012. "Volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der biobasierten Wirtschaft in Deutschland," Thünen Working Paper 144393, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    5. Baumol,William J. & Oates,Wallace E., 1988. "The Theory of Environmental Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521322249, January.
    6. Pannicke, Nadine & Gawe, Erik & Hagemann, Nina & Purkus, Alexandra & Strunz, Sebastian, 2015. "The Political Economy of Fostering a Wood-based Bioeconomy in Germany," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(04), December.
    7. Haidar, Ahmed M.A. & Muttaqi, Kashem & Sutanto, Danny, 2015. "Smart Grid and its future perspectives in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1375-1389.
    8. Purkus, Alexandra & Gawel, Erik & Thrän, Daniela, 2012. "Bioenergy governance between market and government failures: A new institutional economics perspective," UFZ Discussion Papers 13/2012, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pannicke, Nadine & Gawe, Erik & Hagemann, Nina & Purkus, Alexandra & Strunz, Sebastian, 2015. "The Political Economy of Fostering a Wood-based Bioeconomy in Germany," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(04), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Gawel & Nadine Pannicke & Nina Hagemann, 2019. "A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi, 2013. "Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 401-429, April.
    3. Joshua Henkel, 2022. "Economics & Biology: The whole is something besides the parts – a complementary approach to a bioeconomy," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2210, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    4. Nicholas Howarth, 2011. "Clean Energy Technology and the Role of Non-Carbon Price-Based Policy: An Evolutionary Economics Perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 871-891, October.
    5. Alexandra Gottinger & Luana Ladu & Rainer Quitzow, 2020. "Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Leo Wangler, 2010. "Renewables and Innovation - Empirical Assessment and Theoretical Considerations," Jena Economics Research Papers 2010-002, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    7. Benjamin Görlach, 2014. "Emissions Trading in the Climate Policy Mix — Understanding and Managing Interactions with other Policy Instruments," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(3-4), pages 733-749, April.
    8. Gerardo Marletto, 2012. "Which Conceptual Foundations For Environmental Policies? An Institutional And Evolutionary Framework Of Economic Change," Working Papers 0112, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2012.
    9. Kemp, R. & van den Bergh, J., 2006. "Economics and Transitions: Lessons from Economic Sub-disciplines," MERIT Working Papers 2006-038, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Martin Kalthaus & Jiatang Sun, 2021. "Determinants of Electric Vehicle Diffusion in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 80(3), pages 473-510, November.
    11. Adelman, David E. & Spence, David B., 2018. "U.S. climate policy and the regional economics of electricity generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 268-275.
    12. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi & Alessandro Palma, 2014. "Policy Inducement Effects in Energy Efficiency Technologies. An Empirical Analysis on the Residential Sector," SEEDS Working Papers 1914, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Aug 2014.
    13. Marletto, Gerardo, 2012. "Which conceptual foundations for environmental policies? An institutional and evolutionary framework of economic change," MPRA Paper 36441, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Andrew Cheon & Johannes Urpelainen, 2013. "How do Competing Interest Groups Influence Environmental Policy? The Case of Renewable Electricity in Industrialized Democracies, 1989–2007," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(4), pages 874-897, December.
    15. Thomas Dietz & Jan Börner & Jan Janosch Förster & Joachim Von Braun, 2018. "Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Pablo del Río González & Xavier Labandeira Villot, 2009. "Climate Change at Times of Economic Crisis," Economic Reports 05-09, FEDEA.
    17. Nina Hagemann & Erik Gawel & Alexandra Purkus & Nadine Pannicke & Jennifer Hauck, 2016. "Possible Futures towards a Wood-Based Bioeconomy: A Scenario Analysis for Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Wolsink, Maarten, 2020. "Distributed energy systems as common goods: Socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Foxon, T. J. & Gross, R. & Chase, A. & Howes, J. & Arnall, A. & Anderson, D., 2005. "UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2123-2137, November.
    20. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Salant, Stephen W., 2011. "A free lunch in the commons," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 245-253, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:72015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/doufzde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.