IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tuedps/15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Steuerwettbewerb und alternative Vorschläge für ein kommunales Steuersystem in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Wellisch, Dietmar

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag will nun einen Schritt weitergehen und die drei Steuerkandidaten unter dem Blickwinkel des Steuerwettbewerbs zwischen den Gemeinden im Bundesgebiet miteinander vergleichen. Die Gemeinden finanzieren aus dem Aufkommen der kommunalen Unternehmenssteuern lokale öffentliche Leistungen. Man kann sich etwa Ausgaben für den Umweltschutz in der Gemeinde vorstellen. Die einzelnen Gemeinden konkurrieren um Investitionen in ihren Grenzen. Als Mittel zur Anlockung von Investitionen dient die Unternehmenssteuer. Eine geringe Steuer lockt tendenziell Investitionen an. Der Gemeinderat steht also vor der Wahl, entweder durch geringe Steuersätze Investitionen anzulocken und hiermit den Reallohn und die Wohlfahrt der Gemeindehaushalte zu erhöhen oder durch eine angemessene Steuerhöhe öffentliche Konsumausgaben bereitzustellen, was den Nutzen der Gemeindeeinwohner ebenfalls positiv berührt. Allerdings werden Investitionen dann in anderen Gemeinden vorgenommen und erhöhen dort den Reallohn und die Steuerbemessungsgrundlage der kommunalen Unternehmenssteuer. Diesen positiven Effekt in anderen Gemeinden berücksichtigt die einzelne Gemeinde bei der Wahl ihres Steuersatzes (oder Hebesatzes) nicht und wird tendenziell zu wenig Steuern erheben. Inwiefern dieser Effekt bei den verschiedenen Steuern auftritt und die Gemeinden deshalb ein suboptimales Niveau an lokalen Leistungen anbieten, steht im Mittelpunkt des Beitrags.

Suggested Citation

  • Wellisch, Dietmar, 1991. "Steuerwettbewerb und alternative Vorschläge für ein kommunales Steuersystem in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 15, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/104824/1/tdb015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger H. Gordon, 1983. "An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(4), pages 567-586.
    2. Jack Mintz & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Commodity Tax Competition Between Member States of a Federation: Equilibrium and Efficiency," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 449-489, Springer.
    3. Alain Crombrugghe & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "On Pareto Improving Commodity Tax Changes Under Fiscal Competition," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 491-506, Springer.
    4. Oates, Wallace E. & Schwab, Robert M., 1988. "Economic competition among jurisdictions: efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 333-354, April.
    5. Wilson, John D., 1985. "Optimal property taxation in the presence of interregional capital mobility," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 73-89, July.
    6. A. B. Atkinson & N. H. Stern, 1974. "Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 41(1), pages 119-128.
    7. Wellisch, Dietmar & Walz, Uwe, 1991. "Cash-Flow-Steuer als Ersatz für die Gewerbesteuer zur Förderung der kommunalen Autonomie," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 16a, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonzio Rizzo, 2006. "Le inefficienze della competizione fiscale: una rassegna dei principali modelli teorici," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 89-120.
    2. Inman, Robert P. & Rubinfeld, Daniel L., 1996. "Designing tax policy in federalist economies: An overview," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 307-334, June.
    3. Bev Dahlby, 1996. "Fiscal externalities and the design of intergovernmental grants," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 3(3), pages 397-412, July.
    4. Zsolt Becsi, 1998. "Fiscal competition and reality: A time series approach," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 98-19, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    5. Guy Gilbert, 1996. "Le fédéralisme financier, perspectives de microéconomie spatiale," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(2), pages 311-363.
    6. Eggert, Wolfgang, 1995. "Capital tax competition and household mobility," Discussion Papers, Series II 289, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    7. Asmae AQZZOUZ & Michel DIMOU, 2022. "Tax mimicking in French counties," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 55, pages 113-132.
    8. Wallace E. Oates & Wallace E. Oates, 2004. "Fiscal Competition and European Union: Contrasting Perspectives," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 10, pages 182-194, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Levinson, Arik, 1999. "NIMBY taxes matter: the case of state hazardous waste disposal taxes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 31-51, October.
    10. Jeffrey Petchey & Perry Shapiro, 2000. "The Efficiency of State Taxes on Mobile Labour Income," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 76(234), pages 285-296, September.
    11. Braid, Ralph M., 2005. "Tax competition, tax exporting and higher-government choice of tax instruments for local governments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(9-10), pages 1789-1821, September.
    12. Amrita Dhillon & Myrna Wooders & Ben Zissimos, 2007. "Tax Competition Reconsidered," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 9(3), pages 391-423, June.
    13. Zissimos, Ben & Wooders, Myrna, 2005. "Relaxing Tax Competition through Public Good Differentiation," Economic Research Papers 269630, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    14. Lockwood, Ben, 2001. "Tax competition and tax co-ordination under destination and origin principles: a synthesis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 279-319, August.
    15. Boadway, Robin & Tremblay, Jean-François, 2010. "Mobility and Fiscal Imbalance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 63(4), pages 1023-1053, December.
    16. Braid, Ralph M., 2000. "A Spatial Model of Tax Competition with Multiple Tax Instruments," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 88-114, January.
    17. Markusen, James R. & Morey, Edward R. & Olewiler, Nancy, 1995. "Competition in regional environmental policies when plant locations are endogenous," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 55-77, January.
    18. Thierry Madiès, 1997. "Concurrence fiscale et intercommunalité," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 63(1), pages 195-228.
    19. Haufler, Andreas, 1992. "Public goods, international trade, and tax competition," Discussion Papers, Series II 188, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    20. Keen, Michael & Marchand, Maurice, 1997. "Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 33-53, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tuedps:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wftuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.