Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The effectiveness of transnational non-state governance: The role of domestic regulations and compliance assessment in practice

Contents:

Author Info

  • Malets, Olga
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The paper examines how a domestic institutional environment and third-party compliance assessment shape the effects and effectiveness of certification and labeling. Certification represents a form of transnational non-state market-driven governance of the environmental and social performance of firms. Based on an extensive qualitative analysis, this paper explores two factors that influence the forest certification program of the Forest Stewardship Council. First, the institutional setup and the implementation and enforcement of domestic law can restrict the effectiveness of certification if certification requirements contradict or significantly exceed national law or the institutional environment presents significant challenges to certification. Second, I show that third-party auditing, auditors, and certifiers play a crucial role in this challenging institutional environment. I adopt a dynamic approach to the analysis of these elements, focusing on how domestic law and institutions and transnational standards interact over time. Contrary to existing literature, which emphasizes certification and auditing methods and procedures, it is not only how the assessment system is set up but the ways it is applied in practice that shape the implementation of voluntary certification standards and induce certified forestry operations to modify their practices. -- Wirkung und Effektivität von Zertifizierung und Kennzeichnung sind mit dem nationalen institutionellen Umfeld und der externen Bewertung von Compliance verknüpft. Zertifizierung ist eine Form transnationaler, nicht marktgesteuerter Governance der Nachhaltigkeit und Sozialverträglichkeit von Wirtschaftsunternehmen. Auf der Basis einer umfangreichen Qualitätsanalyse untersucht diese Studie zwei Faktoren, die das Waldzertifizierungsprogramm des Forest Stewardship Council beeinflussen. Zum einen können die institutionellen Voraussetzungen sowie Implementierung und Anwendung nationaler Gesetzgebung die Effektivität der Zertifizierung einschränken, wenn ihre Anforderungen den nationalen gesetzlichen Bestimmungen zuwiderlaufen, sie überschreiten oder das institutionelle Umfeld die Zertifizierung erschwert. Zum anderen spielen externes Audit, Auditoren und Zertifizierer eine wichtige Rolle in diesem komplexen institutionellen Umfeld. Mit einer dynamischen Herangehensweise wird analysiert, wie nationale Gesetzgebung, Institutionen und transnationale Standards über längere Zeiträume interagieren. Im Gegensatz zur vorliegenden Literatur, die Zertifizierung, Audit-Methoden und Prozeduren bestätigt, kommt die Autorin zu dem Schluss, dass nicht nur der Aufbau des Zertifizierungssystems, sondern die Art und Weise seiner Anwendung in der Praxis eine Wirkung auf die Implementierung freiwilliger Zertifizierungsstandards und die Einführung zertifizierter Vorgänge in Waldbetrieben haben können.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/82642/1/768208904.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in its series MPIfG Discussion Paper with number 13/12.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 2013
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1312

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Paulstr. 3, 50676 Köln
    Phone: + 49 (0) 221-2767-0
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.mpifg.de/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Graeme Auld & Lars H. Gulbrandsen, 2010. "Transparency in Nonstate Certification: Consequences for Accountability and Legitimacy," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(3), pages 97-119, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.